Are You Angry?

Today the guardian of our Republic, America's favorite son, the Patriot extraordinaire Donald Trump released the following video message for President Obama.



Apparently, there is a horde of angry Americans out there who detest President Obama's lack of transparency.  This über secretive agenda includes concealing his university applications, transcripts, and passport applications from every American that strongly desires, like Donald, the ability to inspect these documents.  Why? you might ask.  Why not? I for one cannot think of any other President whose college transcripts I haven't inspected to my satisfaction.  Really?  I started using the following Twitter hash tag for just these sort of examples of foolishness - #WTFAmerica

If you're angry about this alleged lack of transparency and the complete void of information about our President that it creates, well, frankly I don't know what to say to you.  I could offer the following proposition instead.  Perhaps the Donald could look up each and every member of Congress who doesn't have a college degree and offer to pay for their schooling.

The Survey Says...

Well, we have completed the debate cycle for the 2012 presidential election.  We've heard about domestic policy, foreign policy and everything in between.  So what does the score card look like after three head to head meetings of the candidates for our next President of these United States?  Survey says...Obama 2 - Romney 1.  Romney had Obama on the ropes in round one.  Obama held his own and edged out Romney in round two.  Obama got the KO in round three.  See CNN's poll results for each debate.

Most Americans are neither well informed nor interested in foreign policy discussions, making the final debate not as popular as the other two.  Plus, the debate went head to head with Monday Night Football and game seven of the National League Championship series.  If you didn't watch the last debate you missed something special.  Romney said he had some "zingers" planned for the first round.  We heard about "trickle down government" and the "economy tax" on the middle class  Well, Obama had some hay makers in store for us in round three.  We got gems like "The 1980's are calling and they want their foreign policy back" and "In 1917 we had more horses and bayonets too!".

Beyond the war of words, let's get down to the substance.  President Obama has been the Commander-In-Chief for the past four years.  During his first term the war in Iraq was brought to conclusion, Osama bin Laden was assassinated, and the draw down of troops in Afghanistan has begun.  When Obama first ran for the Office of the Presidency recognizing his weaknesses in the foreign policy arena, he chose Joe Biden as his running mate.  Biden's experience in foreign policy includes his long tenure as a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.  This was and continues to be an asset to the Obama administration.  By comparison, Governor Romney with no foreign policy experience chose a running mate with an equally insufficient foreign policy resume.

When given the opportunity to detail his foreign policy platform Romney spent half of the time agreeing with the actions and policies implemented by the Obama administration and the other half telling us about his experience as Governor of Massachusetts with a touch of psycho-babble added in (witness the "I love teachers" diatribe).  Does serving as the governor of a small New England state that shares no borders with any other country really qualify as foreign policy experience?  Hell, you can't even see Russia from there!  Jesse Ventura was once the governor of Minnesota, which shares a border with Canada.  Presidential?  Probably not.

Americans need to develop a deeper comprehension concerning the position our nation occupies in the community of nations and among many actors on the international stage in the 21st century   We do not wield the hegemony we did in the decades following the Second World War.  The bi-polar detente that existed during the Cold War no longer defines the background of our relationships with other countries.  The rise of new world powers such as India and China, the actions of rogue nation states and their ruling elite, and the impact of zealous ideologies espoused by terrorist organizations have forever changed the manner in which we engage other nations.  These realities require a foreign policy that combines measured diplomacy with national security.  We will learn that the most powerful military in the world is no match for the convictions of extremists who do not measure their victory in terms of regime change or occupying forces.

So, it's up to you now to vote.  Early voting and absentee voting began this week.  To find out more information about early voting and absentee ballots please visit www.canivote.org  This is a much better option for many people than waiting in line on election day.  Do NOT get discouraged.  Let your voice be heard.  GO VOTE!

Who Will Win?

This post is a little less timely than I would have liked, but I took a rest to visit with some friends during last night's debate and had to put my DVR to good use.  Fortunately, my wife has left some space on the DVR for just this purpose.  I also want to thank all the people who read my random rants that reminded me I was shirking my responsibilities to keep the verbal tirade coming.  Thank you for your thoughts and your comments.  Whether you agree with me or not, I appreciate your interest.

Clash Of The Titans

I read a few articles in the local paper and saw some of the post debate coverage in social media and on television, so I'm not going to rehash those things.  I'm not even going to select and expound upon which candidate I think came out the winner from last night's debate.  Instead, I would challenge you to think about the questions that were asked by the audience and decide which of them was of particular interest to you.

Of course there were some good topical areas covered including: the economy, tax policy, the national deficit, healthcare, equal pay for equal work, immigration policy, national security, assault weapons bans, education, and foreign trade.  I'm pretty passionate about all these things and I feel like many of these issues are close to me personally and professionally.  My wife is a law student who is interested in immigration and labor law.  I'm a government employee that serves an agency mission which focuses on worker training, workplace safety, and the security of the employed and the unemployed.

Despite all the public policy issues that were addressed last night and my or your position on those issues, the question I found most revealing about who will win this election was the last one asked.  The last audience member to address the candidates asked, and I'm paraphrasing, what the candidates' thought the biggest misconception that the public has of each of them.

Governor Romney answered first and responded that he cares about 100% of the American people, his passion comes from his belief in the same God we all believe in, and he wants to use his experience in the private sector to bring America back to prosperity.  President Obama responded that he doesn't believe that big government can solve all the problems that exist, he believes in the free enterprise model tempered by an equity standard and that Americans have a serious choice in this election to between two different perspectives on social issues.  The biggest difference in these answers is the level of integrity that each candidate has.

President Obama has a record of four years in the White House that Governor Romney has attempted to utilize to discredit the President and present himself as a better option for the Executive Office.  The reality is, Mr. Romney has a record too which he seems very adverse to being held accountable to.  We have policy statements made by Governor Romney throughout the Republican primary and campaign speeches made by the Romney-Ryan camp in the last several months.  This extant record presents a picture of a man who struggles with his own integrity when has been pressed to defend these positions.  Much of his debate rhetoric contradicts where he stood a few weeks ago.

The integrity issue is brought center stage by the comments of the candidate who when behind closed doors espouses a position of divisiveness the likes of which are simply un-presidential. Can Governor Romney really walk back the statements he made about the 47% of Americans who, as he so eloquently stated, "consider themselves victims, rely on government for their basic needs and who refuse to take personal responsibility for themselves."?  I think not.  A truer picture of the man was presented behind those doors than what we have seen in these debates so far.  His answer to that final question is either a blatant lie or an attempt to deceive the American public.

And the Winner Is...Part II

This evening the Nation had its first and only opportunity to see Vice President Joe Biden go head to head with Congressman Paul Ryan.  This event was certainly a departure from last week's Presidential debate.  Many individuals, myself included, felt Governor Romney took full advantage of the opportunity afforded the challenger in these debates and walked away a "winner".  Tonight was different.  Vice President Biden didn't allow Paul Ryan to play the cards Governor Romney did.  Basically, the incumbent candidate did not spend the entire evening defending four years of public record while the challenger sold a platform of cherry picked  policy positions that poll well with the public, carefully selected from legislation passed during the last four years.  This game plan worked very well for Romney last week.  He was successful at keeping President Obama on the defensive while he presented a revised policy platform that benefited from the flexibility afforded the challenger.  This flexibility included an adoption of the positions most popular with the electorate as "part of my plan" with no additional details.  Brilliant!  We learned Romney now supports everything the majority of Americans like, is against the things that happened in the last four years that America didn't like, and the rest of the details - well that can wait.  You'll find that out once Romney becomes President.

Tonight was different.  Every time Ryan tried to run last week's game plan, Biden ran his defense and went immediately onto the offense.  Ryan was challenged by both the moderator - who was exceptional I may add - and by Biden's commitment to doubling down on the facts.  Every vague policy statement from Congressman Ryan was tempered by the challenge to present details. Congressman Ryan was big on the usual platitudes - American values, peace through strength, and a commitment to prosperity for all.  Ryan and Romney constantly describe the America they want to create, but provide little to no detail on how we are going to get there.  The reality is, the domestic conditions that we currently face in this country will not change on day one, week one, or month one of a new administration.  Without providing the details of "the plan" it's nice of Romney and Ryan to provide their aspirations but that's not a public policy platform - it's a description of an objective without a strategy to get there.

So, yeah - Biden evened the score this evening.  We'll wait to see what happens next week when the Presidential candidates debate foreign policy.  Based on Romney's failed attempts this summer to demonstrate competency on the international stage, I'm pretty confident we'll see what true leadership looks like.

Is This Big Gov'ment?

If you've been watching the news lately or reading your local paper, you've probably heard about the meningitis outbreak that's captured the Nation's attention.  The source of this particular form of fungal meningitis has been linked to a steroid injection produced by the Massachusetts drug compounding firm New England Compounding Center.  This compounding center has announced a recall of 17,500 doses of a steroid pain treatment injection that had been distributed to 23 states.  Anybody who has received this form of pain treatment utilizing steroid injections produced by this firm has been encouraged to monitor their health closely and see a doctor if meningitis symptoms occur.  So far 137 cases of meningitis and 12 deaths have been linked to this batch of bad drugs.

How does this happen, you may ask.  How could your loved one receive a simple steroid injection for pain treatment and later perish from an infection caused by bad drugs?  It happens when the standards of public health that we take for granted in the United States are lowered by the demands of industry to make a profit in a relaxed regulatory environment.  The Food and Drug Administration, the federal agency responsible for ensuring that our food and pharmaceuticals are safe for the public's consumption, is not able to effectively carry out its consumer protection mission in this State regulated industry.  Medical compounding firms are outside of the regulatory jurisdiction of the FDA.  Their oversight has been left to State agencies that have wildly varying standards of self-regulation for these firms.  The following statements from an article by CNN articulate the issue at hand:

"Currently, the FDA does not have jurisdiction over compounding pharmacies until there is a problem. FDA officials say they have been fighting to change that for more than 20 years.

The compounding pharmacy industry has challenged those efforts, and courts have ruled that individual state health departments are in charge."

I think it bears mentioning that this issue is occurring in the very state where Mitt Romney was formerly the Governor.  Now before you go and accuse me of trying to pin something on Mr. Romney that he had little or nothing to do with (because Republicons have never done that to President Obama), I'd like to make the following connection that does stick.  The current Romney-Ryan platform directly states that over-regulation of private industry hinders the American economy and kills jobs.  Furthermore, over-reaching federal agencies staffed by armies of malevolent overpaid bureaucrats have made small businesses such as the New England Compounding Center the target of their recovery ruining regulatory agenda.  We need fewer regulations and more authority turned over to State governments because that level of government knows what's in the best interest of all citizens (unless the governor is a Democrat - then it's probably suspect).  The agenda is clear - less regulation from "big gov'ment" so that the morals of free market Capitalism lightly touched by magnanimous State governments can flourish.  Romney's campaign calls it "Smaller, Smarter, Simpler Government".

The Tea Party's Call To Arms

It appears that lassez faire model ran amok in Massachusetts.  The consequence so far has been the death of 12 individuals and possibly more as the days pass and the investigation continues.  If Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan are elected, you will see more of this.  Just think, when funding is cut for FDA inspections of food processing companies and more outbreaks of E-coli and related health problems start to occur, you'll begin taking a closer look at how "big gov'ment" regulation impacts your life.

Whose Values Are These?

While I was watching television this evening, I happened to see this new political advertisement sponsored by the Campaign for American Values Political Action Committee.  Take a look...

At first I thought it was some kind of spoof video leading into the beginning of Jimmy Kimmel Live, which was coming on next.  It wasn't until the final few seconds when the sponsoring organization was announced that I realized this was not someone's attempt at political satire - it was an actual appeal to the electorate to vote for the Romney/Ryan ticket.  Thank God for DVR, because I immediately had to do a double take rewind and watch this again just to make sure I hadn't missed the punch line.

So this is supposed to represent American values, or more specifically President Obama's attack on American values?  I guess you have to be able to see the forest from the trees to understand the inherent contradiction here.  Religious Liberty, essentially freedom from the tyranny of a state religion or the political authority vested in the divine right of a monarch or similar despot determined to rule under the auspices of God's favor, is an important American value.  Somehow, this value has been corrupted in an attempt to validate the irrational fiction that you see in this advertisement.

The President is judged guilty of consorting with Muslims, turning his back on God's chosen people,  and forcing Americans (apparently a monolithic group of dogmatic believers) to pay for abortion drugs.  It doesn't take a genius to understand the intended audience for this foolishness is a group of devout evangelical Christians who will somehow suspend all other tenants, teachings and testaments of their Faith to become enraged with the apparent anti-Christian actions of the Sinner-in-Chief, President Obama.  Then comes the slight of hand.  We should take action against the traitor Obama by voting for the standard bearers of Christian orthodoxy, Mitt Romney (Mormon) and Paul Ryan (Roman Catholic).  (Definition of Irony - Roman Catholic teachings state that the Mormon Church is a non-Christian cult)

Regardless of your religion, your political affiliations or even your intended choice for President, do the falsehoods, malicious intentions and judgement contained in this advertisement represent your values?  Are these American values?  Are these Christian values?  Whose values are these?

A Sense of Place and Pride...

Today I had the opportunity to take a break from my normal work routine to do some family and tribal history exploration at the Oneida Cultural Heritage Department on the Oneida Nation Reservation.  My cousin and I made the road trip to the rez on a fantastic fall day when the color of the trees was glorious.  The weather was great for the drive as well.  My cousin showed me around the old family homesteads.  It was great to see all the locations where my relatives had lived.  As a tribal person, our history is very important to us as is a sense of place and the relevance of those places to our collective stories as families and as tribal Nations.

Oneida Nation Tribal Seal

We met with the tribal historian and some of the other staff to talk about family and to view some amazing documents that are part of the Brothertown Indian Nation collection in the care of the Oneida Nation.  It was nice to sit and listen to the wealth of oral history, both family and tribal, that my cousin and the Oneida tribal historian possess.  The amount of historical information the two of them have committed to memory and can recount at a moments notice is staggering.  I learned some new things today about some historical figures and  families that were really interesting.  The big bonus came when my cousin got in touch with the Holy Apostles Episcopal Church secretary in an attempt to find out some information about my great-great-grandmother who is buried in the cemetery there.  We weren't successful in finding the location of her grave, but did find out that there was a service at the church when she passed.

Brothertown Indian Nation Tribal Seal

We had an opportunity to look at some of the documents and historical texts that are part of the larger Brothertown Collection.  I'm looking forward to seeing the 200+ historic photos of tribal members when they are scanned and indexed.  The absolutely most amazing part of the Collection is the Record Book of the Brothertown Peacemakers Court.  This larger leather bound ledger book goes back to the 1790's, when the first entries were made.  The last recorded entry was made in 1844.  Of course the book is all hand written and contains the stories of many of the members of the tribe.  My great-great-great grandmother's uncle, John Skeesuck, was one of the first Peacemakers for the tribe.  This is truly an amazing piece of tribal judicial history in the United States.

And The Winner Is...

This evening America had the opportunity to watch President Obama and Governor Romney debate one another for the first time.  I watched the debate on CNN with a friend and a few beers.  I tried to take good notes and was eager to hear Romney's "zingers" that he's allegedly been working on for the past several weeks.  I think I heard a few of them like "trickle down government" and "economy tax".  If you watched it you probably had a few in mind yourself.

A friend of mine asked who I thought won.  I am obviously quite partisan and biased, so my vote in November is pretty obvious.  In spite of that, I had to say that I think the advantage went to Governor Romney in this first debate.  The advantage is held by the challenger in these debates as the incumbent is constantly on the defensive attempting to defend the record of the first four years.  I think Romney used that advantage quite effectively this evening.

The important take away however is not who won or who lost.  As a member of the electorate, you need to decide who presents a better set of policies for you.  I was particularly amused by Governor Romney's cherry picking approach as Jim Lehrer attempted (unsuccessfully I may add) to moderate a direct comparison between the candidate's policies on key domestic issues.  Romney attempted to select the positive aspects of legislation passed during the past four years while at the same time leaving the electorate completely in the dark as to how he would work with Congress to craft legislation that would implement the rest of "his plan". Analytically, you have to decide if you heard enough detail from either candidate to support your vote for that set of policies.  I didn't hear any specifics from Romney,only generalizations and the "likes" he borrowed from President Obama.

I'll end this post with the following thought - Governor Romney stated one of the primary purposes of government is to defend the Constitution.  Along those lines he claims that the principles of Freedom and Liberty can be achieved through a strong military.  How specifically are Freedom and Liberty achieved in a domestic sense through a strong military?  I'm not convinced.

Can I Get A Ride?

Each work day, I wake up promptly at 5:00 a.m. so that I can shower, shave, dress, pack my lunch and drive to the train station in order to board the 6:24 a.m. Amtrak train to Chicago.  I arrive in the Windy City shortly before 8:00 a.m.  A short walk to my office in the Loop and I'm clocked in.  I repeat this process in reverse at 5:00 p.m. and arrive back home around 6:45 p.m.  All this amounts to a twelve hour work day including my commuting time.

Am I complaining - no, not really.  Why?  Because I love my job.  No, seriously - I love my job!  What really jerks my chain however is the possibility that I could have been riding on a high speed train were it not for Governor Scott Walker's campaign promise to kill high speed rail in Wisconsin.  Once elected, he did just that by returning a federal grant to the U.S. Department of Transportation that was supposed to be an investment in high speed rail infrastructure connecting Wisconsin to the rest of the Midwest.  This regional system of high speed routes would have connected Milwaukee to the Twin Cities, Chicago, St. Louis, Detroit, Cleveland and other destinations.

Why did Governor Walker want to kill high speed rail in Wisconsin? You ask.  Because he and his Republicon cronies believe, "nobody will ride it."  Forget the fact that the Hiawatha Amtrak line between Milwaukee and Chicago is one of the busiest routes Amtrak operates.  Every work day the train is full of individuals that commute like I do to white collar career employment opportunities in Illinois.  A significant number of these daily commuters work at Miller Coors corporate headquarters and in the financial sector.  To add insult to injury, our Republicon presidential candidate, Mitt Romney, has proposed the elimination of federal funding for Amtrak among other publicly supported  ventures like PBS and the National Endowment for the Arts.  This is coming from an individual who claims he will create 12 million jobs during his first term as President.  

There are no viable private passenger rail services in the Midwest.  Privatization is not an option.  If federal subsidies for Amtrak are eliminated, we will be forced to attempt to drive to work and  park in Chicago.  Without Amtrak, I would not be able to afford my commute.  I would venture a guess that many others who ride the train every day would not be able to afford the commute either.  Why would a candidate who claims he wants to create more jobs take away my opportunity to get to mine?  If you think federal subsidies for Amtrak are a waste of tax payer dollars, check out federal subsidies for our interstate system and airports and tell me you still think passenger rail is a raw deal.

Genesis

I have been thinking about starting a blog for some time after being encouraged by many friends to share my random rants with a larger online community.  In that spirit, I am beginning this blog as a means of cleaning up their Facebook walls.

I will be sharing my political views and observations on life in this space.  I hope that my experiences will, if nothing else, make you think.  I am discouraged by the lack of critical thought in our society.  Anything I can contribute that encourages more analytic thinking in this Nation of ours will certainly be a good thing.

I will end this short introductory post with the following meme which serves as a visual expression of where I hope to go with this.